) Congratulations! https://youtu.be/iMGbn0osrTA
(and
) by Andy Cripps. When I started the contest, I did not realize how important durability would be. The camera mount has snapped off of every one of the designs I have flown except these. Basically, the camera mount ends up taking the impact of a lot of crashes (which isn&
;t good for the camera either). This designer&
;s camera mount, which has three connectors, outperformed the other designs. Also, the battery clip and motor clips are exactly the right size (or perhaps a bit small?) and therefore do a better job at holding the parts in place, which also important for durability. Congratulations.
by ahmadnazree. The design is extremely light, and yet the clips are spaced far apart -- hence in in line-of-sight flight it has the best flight characteristics of any of the designs. (Probably because it is light; possibly something about the center of gravity vs where the propellers are?) However, the problem with the design is it is extremely fragile and therefore hard to use despite many times super-gluing it back together after crashes. Also the battery clip is a bit too big so the battery slides around. I might try printing it in glass-filled nylon, which is expensive...but maybe more durable?
by walxo. The interlocking modular mechanism works very well, and is very clever. The battery clip works the best of any of the designs. The designer noticed that the camera I am using is actually different from the original camera (which I had not noticed) and corrected the camera mount accordingly. The big problem with the design is the clips that connect to the airplane body; they are too fragile and bendy and cause the mount to oscillate which makes it hard to fly the drone
by design territory. The mounts for the flight controller are a nice touch.
;m afraid
;ve learned from here. Eventually I&
;ll post some flight video at my youtube channel "Drone Bites Man FPV"
;m ready to announce the winner. First, some things I learned, which I did not expect and were not in the contest requirements. 1. The two-clip design is crucial, because otherwise the mount starts to oscillate. 2. a durable design is crucial when printing in nylon -- this stuff is just not as robust as plastic.
by ahmad nazree and
and
by andy cripps. I have got these designs to fly successfully using line of sight.
by ahmad nazree is a little fragile though and the camera mount broke off on the second flight. I have not tried anything FPV yet.
by walxo and
by design territory also appear to meet all requirements. I have had trouble getting
to fly successfully; it turns out if a mount is too short the propellers and mount start to oscillate. I did not realize that would happen.
by supra 77 has only 1 clip;
by vit gean has only 2 clips. Technically, I wanted both 1 clip and 2 clip designs, so these do not meet requirements, but I have tried printing them anyway.
by sava has only 1 clip. Sava also has another 2 clip design,
, but the flight controller would be mounted upside down. Technically one can flip a flight controller in betaflight so I will try printing those as well even though there are some issues with meeting requirements.
by Alzazari_tech returned printing errors.
and others by sherifelsheikh also returned printing errors.
by vipin kadambur had holes that were a bit too large for the flight controller screws.
by Fadi Sayegh the camera mount was too small or flight controller mount too large.
by R.Vasanth did not have all three designs required in the PPT.
by Darcas had a battery mount of an incorrect size. (The batteries&
; cross-sections are rectangles not squares.)
by AnwarDM and
by MS22 Design both had propeller mounts that were too small (not enlarged to 7mm).
by LickuidCAD had the camera mount upside down.
by Islam Heikal the screw holes for mounting the flight controller appear to be missing
;t print in ABS, and since I didn&
;t specify ABS in the original requirements, I&
;m printing the test runs in nylon using FDM/MJF
by ahmadnazree -- missing two mounting holes for the flight controller. technically, one can mount the flight controller with only two holes (and it saves weight on screws/bolts) but it makes me nervous, the flight controllers are expensive ($60ish)
by walxo -- don&
;t have all parts so can&
;t print, hence unrated
by MS22 Design -- also in the lead, although not yet flight tested anything
by Dev Shah -- the direction of the flight controller has been changed. For tiny whoops, traditionally the flight controller is on the diagonal
by Andy Cripps -- still in the lead, meets all requirements, although not yet tried flight testing anything
by Anwar DM -- I get errors when I try to print it
by sava -- I appreciate the creativity and rearrangement of parts. I get errors when I try to print it though, and the direction of the flight controller has been changed. For tiny whoops, traditionally the flight controller is on the diagonal
Drone Bites Man
Buyer