Bring a Game-Changing Renewable Energy Invention to Life!. Winner to be named: "Lead CAD Designer for the Invention"

If you do a rendering. you might place the fan/blower angled opposite the approximate center of the turbine. I know the renderings reveal a channel with fans on one end. However strongest placement may be as I have suggested...that is if CAD can actually demonstrate real-time turbine circulation and output in kwh based on the wind sent at it in mph.

I am not sure what&;s best...less time for you [others] to put into it. Your choice...I think I&;d prefer results right away.

First paragraph - yes - it is just like that.
Second one - "the design of the system allows consumers who do not want to cover their rooftop with solar panels, another option" - what option? Getting even less power from existing solar panels (because of losses in turbine schemes), and even less, because of reducing the area of solar panels.

I understand that there is no obligation of participating, but it is just better for you to know that, unfortunately, this thing would not run as you expect, and will cost as an airplane.
About realtime working model - do you want it as a rendered video or you want to change parameters to see results instantly?

A few typos there...my apologies.

...which means [and I can&;t believe I&;m realizing this now..:)!] is...the amount of kwh produced by the turbines should be more than the fans require. If five fans each require 21 watts to run. Then the turbines should produce more.

Even if this isn&;t achievable and the total system produces a bit less than solar panels, the design of the system allows consumers who don&;t want to cover their rooftop with solar panels, another option...maybe at a little less power, or maybe more. That&;s where blade design, torque and other factors, over time, would help improve outputs.

*There&;s no obligation to participate in the contest. A real-time ltime, working CAD model is just what&;s needed right now to present to investors, and intersted licensees.

I am not saying that this 1kW is the full power of solar panels, I say, that if we take from all solar generation 1kW, in output we will have at max 650W. In another example - solar panels are giving us 2kW, 1kW goes to blower, turbine gives us 650W, in summary we get 1,65kW.
If we forget about blower and use natural wind (from wind we get 850W, for example) - it will be 2kW from solar + 850W of turbine generation, in result it will be 2.85kW. That is how solar+wind generators work, separately getting energy from wind and sun.

I respect your comment. However, your not putting the full 1 kw into the fans/blowers. Referring to my renderings in the patent, your sending to the fans only that which they require and sending what still remains from the 1 kw to the storage battery. That amount when combined with the turbine output kwh is what your giving to the homeowner to use. So you have two sources of kwh that are taken together to supply the homeowner from one battery that collects both of those energies [i.e. excess kwh solar energy not used to power the fans + kwh turbines produced].

"wind-solar hybrid systems already work in the real world" - yes, they work, as separate solar panels and wind generator. In your idea it is different - you take 1kW of power from solar panels (for simplicity), put 1kW into a fan, to produce wind (even with 100% efficiency), then turbine from that wind will produce only 650W (using provided coefficient). If you want to use turbine separately, then, depending on wind, it will produce one amount of electricity, and solar panels will produce another amount. In the second case we will be summoning those 2 amounts, but in your case? unfortunately, we would not

However the first priority in all of this is, SAFETY...please keep that in mind as you create a design.

Ai can help in explaining the nuances of what I have, per the below. Hope you see the strengths as they could arise once a real-time performing model is created.

It&;s the total output that is the ultimate determination of its appeal, need by consumers...and, the compactness of the design. Essentially, if I can get comparable final outputs to present day solar setups [regardless of energy losses along its path ----- who cares, :), then I might have a new, niche product for consumers.

I compare what I have as a new component in a home. If any of you are homeowners, then you have a furnace, hot water heater, maybe an air conditioner or two on concrete slabs sitting outside your home.

My invention would now be a fourth component in a home. However once installed it could power the entire home including an electric furnace, electric hot water heater, electric stove....if the consumer wanted to replace them...saving on gas, and, electricity costs.

The software for my system, if you are able to go through the patent provides for sending excess energy back to the grid, for hopefully cash credit to the consumer who owns my invention; thus a smal form of passive income exists with an install.

Also, I&;m going to be including in the consumer&;s app for the unit an application where they will be able to add the dates and costs of when they add electric components and determine when real savings will begin based on the install of their system (I&;m still working on that spreadsheet).

Sure! Here’s the revised version using "turbines" instead of "generator" for clarity:


---

Subject: Addressing Concerns About the Design

I get where you’re all coming from, but I think there’s a bit of a misunderstanding about what my system is actually doing.

It’s not just about transferring energy from solar panels to turbines—it’s about capturing extra energy that would otherwise be wasted.

1. It’s About Adding Energy, Not Just Converting It

You’re looking at this as if I’m just running solar power through extra steps and losing efficiency along the way.

But, the turbines aren’t just passive components—they’re actively harvesting energy from the airflow.

The solar panels power the fans, creating controlled wind.

That wind then spins the turbines, which generate additional electricity.

Even with some losses, we end up with more total energy than solar alone.


2. Efficiency Numbers Don’t Tell the Whole Story

I get the concern about efficiency, but total energy output matters more. A 100% efficient system that only collects 500W is still worse than a 50% efficient system that collects 800W.

The goal here is to increase the overall energy captured, not just chase high efficiency percentages.

3. I don&;t think the computer fan test is the best comparison, for these reasons:

I know the two-fan test seems like an easy way to check this, but it’s not really an apples-to-apples comparison.

A computer fan isn’t designed to extract energy efficiently like a turbine.

Wind turbines are optimized for energy conversion, not just airflow.

Plus, wind-solar hybrid systems already work in the real world, proving the concept is viable.

4. The Real Test is Building It

At the end of the day, the best way to see if this works is through actual testing. Plenty of ideas have looked inefficient on paper but worked great when built. If efficiency losses outweigh the energy gained, then sure, it’s a problem—but we won’t know until we try.

I think it’s worth at least drafting this out and seeing where we can optimize. What do you think?

Eric,

Alexandero1 raises the correct issue. This device doesn&;t make sense from the basic premise according to physics. You cannot generate more energy output from your fan blades than what you are supplying via electrical input. It is physically impossible.

Putting a windmill on a car that generates energy as it moves forward is the same idea - you will always be at a net loss. This is from a mechanical engineer.

Really can&;t understand where energy will come from - energy from solar panels can go directly to battery (let&;s count it as 100% efficiency), if we simplify schematics to just powering one motor, to rotate generator directly - DC motor to rotate shaft (from solar panels) - eff. 90% (good), generator - eff. 90% (good), so, 81% efficiency of just solar panels. With wind turbines, as you&;ve mentioned - 65% only on turbine, and there&;s resistance and fan efficiency. So why do we need those men in the middle? Can&;t see any reason to even stating to draft, because of those calculations. If you want a test - you can take 2 computer fans, place one in front of another, power one of them and check output power of another one and see efficiency

Please note...Original Assumption and Revised Assumption are column headings under which the data mentioned falls into.

Hers&;s a spectrum of potential results using five solar panels rated at 375 watts each, over five hours of direct sunlight, using five dc fans/blowers positioned PRECISELY at each of five wind turbines for maximum rotation over those five hours of sun:

Component Original Assumption Revised Assumption
Turbine Efficiency Near 100% (unrealistic) ~65% (realistic, with losses)
Turbine Output (5 turbines) 18 kWh 0.153 kWh
Solar Output (4 panels) 7.5 kWh 7.5 kWh
Total Output (panels and turbines) 18 kwh 7.653 kWh

There was been a wide spectrum of results from using engineering.com and omnicalculator.com. Most recently chat ai has delivered the same spectrum of results. One set of outputs from chatbot Ai was promising.

The entire patent history can be found here, https://patentcenter.uspto.gov/applications/17399465/ifw/transactions
The patent, I thought would be attached to the contest? If not you will be able to download it via the link I just shared.

alexandero1 you raise a very valid issue. This is the very reason I need an advanced CAD working model done that will, hopefully provide real-time outputs. There will be losses for sure; and that has been a criticism. My goal is that the final output when combined with the excess solar energy, taken together in KWH, will provide what a homeowner needs.

Part of the "selling" aspect of the invention is, if we can prove it can at least match a solar/battery installation as you see today on homes, it will provide an OPTION for consumers who, for instance, don&;t want their entire roofs covered with solar panels. And it&;s my goal and hope, the excess solar energy that builds up in the batteries that is to be sent back to the grid, will result in helpful cash credits going into the owner&;s (consumer&;s) bank account.

can i have a sample image pls

I tried searching this patent in US Patent&;s official site I can&;t find it anywhere.

As I see it
tldr: you use solar panels to power fan, than turbine using the wind of the fan, generate electricity?
So solar panels with extra steps (and losses)? Or I&;m missing something?